In the last 6 months I have been to almost a dozen countries presenting at conferences or attending valuable workshops. One of the most interesting presentations I was asked by Fred and Marilyn Matis to give was at a meeting (called a “fireside”) that is for members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints who either struggle with same-sex attraction or have friends/family that do.
In previous blog entries I talked a little about what it was like growing up a Mormon, and later answered some questions in a blog entry on what do Mormons believe, and so this whole topic is one that is interesting and important to me.
At the Matis event, I was asked to speak for about an hour on a a fun topic – some of life’s greatest lessons that I learned from a friend and mentor, a retired Air Force fighter pilot – who was an inspiring example of how God can definitely work with and through people that are imperfect (which always gives hope to me).
I know that homosexuality in the context of Christianity is a sensitive topic, and there is a lot of tension and misunderstanding on all sides of the issue. I don’t claim to have all the answers, but here are some things I have learned:
• I am convinced that in most instances, same-sex attraction is not a choice. In our society, why would anyone choose it?
• As the Matis’ point out – instead of worrying about a “cause” or “cure” – both of which we might never find – we should focus more energy on “care”. How can we learn to care more about people around us regardless of how they are different from us? And not just caring about them but also learning from them – because quite often they are inspiring!
• Most of these individuals are not a threat to anyone – but have actually spent a good portion of their lives beating themselves up about something they did not choose, wishing they were different, and trying to hide it from others. In trying to hide anything, it seems to magnify it out of proportion. When any of us begins to focus on some thing(s) that we don’t like about ourselves, we often miss seeing how much good there is in who we are.
• The way our society, media, etc… deals with matters of sex and sexuality are usually based more on image, indulgence, anxiousness, lust, fear, and unrealizable expectations instead of on principles of real love, thinking of others more than ourselves, and respect. This makes it difficult to understand or discuss these matters.
• When there is a judgmental culture, it influences people to hide anything about themselves which others might potentially look down on. That often limits their ability to feel truly accepted and loved/lovable.
• This does not mean that “anything goes and is equally OK” – or that we can have no basis for choosing personal standards because that might mean that it seems we are also placing a judgment on others. Just letting anyone do whatever they feel like never has led people to be more more wise or happy. Rather, it means that we do always seek and strive for those things which really do unlock the greatest potential in ourselves, others, and society as a whole – while at the same time having more patience and compassion for others (and ourselves) in the process.
• At our core, what we all want more than anything (regardless of who we are) is to be loved and accepted. One great thing about these meetings is that it allows people to be honest about themselves (in some cases for the first time), to recognize they are not alone, and especially to realize that there is nothing about who they are that needs to keep them from being truly loved and accepted (especially things which were not a choice). We all have our own difficulties and differences (whatever they may be), yet innately want to be close to God and others.
Those are some of the things I have been learning, as I am trying to make sense of homosexuality in light of Christianity.
Do you agree/disagree on any of these points?
Does anyone have anything additional to add?
Clint,
I like you points. The only one that I might take some issue with is the first point-
“I am convinced that in most instances, same-sex attraction is not a choice. In our society, why would anyone choose it?”
Whether this is accurate or not is not my objection. It might very well be the case that same-sex attraction is not a choice. The second part of the comment is what closes doors for me and nullifies many of the following points.
Framing the conversation in this way retains the Othering of gayness. Homosexuality is still seen as deficit, perverted, and delinquent. Was this the intended frame or was it subterranean?
If it was intended, it is difficult for me to see how a project and focus on care could be carried out or emphasized.
Adam
Adam, your comment made me think for a bit. In the first point, I guess I was thinking about how unlikely it is for an individual to choose something that is looked down on so much by general society (regardless of whether society should feel that way or not towards individuals – particularly if it is not a choice of the individual).
Whether we like it or not, in today’s society there definitely still is a general feeling of “Otherness” towards GLBT, pronounced in Christianity – but I don’t see how the attitude of the general society should stop individuals or groups from having a position or focus on care. Does that make sense?
It perhaps will get to the point (that Fred Matis thinks) where saying you have same sex attraction will be no more shocking than saying what you had for breakfast.
In the mean time, I actually think this whole issue will end up being a big blessing to people of faith – as I hope it will push all of us to be more honest about the things we struggle with, and at the same time struggle more with how we can increase the type of care and love in our lives that truly connects us with God and others.
Thanks for the comment Adam – I always like hearing your thoughts.
Here is an interesting proposal led by Jacob Z. Hess (a Ph.D. Candidate in Clinical-Community Psychology at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign) that seeks to bring liberals and conservatives together to talk with each other regarding this issue:
Dialogue proposal
The idea is that through well-facilitated intergroup meetings many misunderstandings can be resolved and polarization of parties can be minimized.
He is currently seeking feedback on this proposal, so if you have any thoughts, feel free to share them.
After meeting and talking with the wonderful people I’ve met at the Matis’, I have found myself agreeing with the first point you make. At least with friends there, who are “struggling with same-gender attraction” (or SSA–their choice of phrasing as opposed to “gay”, which implies a lifestyle which they are choosing not to live), it has become more apparent to me of the many challenges they face on different levels. Though I love and admire them very much, I understand the question “why would they choose it?” as more of an empathetic one, (more in recognition of their angst and and fight and challenges–even hate from others, but judgments at the very least, being shot at them from every angle) rather than a question intended to criticize their choices or judge them for their same-gender attractions. I read is as equivalent of something like: “Given the hate, criticism, judgments and trials they will face, a person would likely not sign up for it solely by choice, but is rather more likely responding to feelings already in existence (whatever the explanation for the feelings).” Especially when, at least for these LDS members who have SSA, it is contrary to what they believe as God’s plan, which centers around the family and procreation. All I know is, I empathize the more I talk with them. I admire their commitment to their faith and their tackling of their daily struggles with strength and dedication, despite discouragement. The more I learn the less I tend to judge and the more I just want them to know they are loved for exactly who they are.